Manyvids 2024 Jack And Jill Hayley Davies Hot A... File
The “Jack and Jill” career is not without its strains. Relationship strain is real; turning intimacy into a production can blur boundaries between performance and genuine affection. Many successful couples schedule “off-camera” date nights where phones and cameras are banned. Additionally, the market is saturated. Standing out requires constant innovation—trying new fetish niches (e.g., POV, roleplay, femdom), improving production value, and adapting to platform changes.
Your first task is to define your brand. Are you the “boyfriend/girlfriend next door,” the “goth couple,” or the “highly athletic fitness duo”? Successful couples carve out a specific aesthetic and personality. For example, creators like Mr. and Mrs. Smith or The Lovers (pseudonyms) succeed because they maintain consistent lighting, wardrobe (or lack thereof), and on-camera personas. Authenticity, however, does not mean a lack of professionalism. Consistency in video quality, cover thumbnails, and descriptive titles builds viewer trust and encourages repeat purchases. ManyVids 2024 Jack And Jill Hayley Davies Hot A...
Finally, privacy is a perpetual concern. Even with geo-blocking and pseudonyms, there is a risk of being recognized. Couples should use separate stage names, obscure identifying tattoos or backgrounds, and use a VPN for all business-related activities. The “Jack and Jill” career is not without its strains
Secondly, health and safety are paramount. Successful couples treat their work like a sport: regular STI testing (every 30-60 days), clear communication about boundaries, and access to emergency contraception or PEP (post-exposure prophylaxis) are non-negotiable. Financially, couples must decide on a split (e.g., 50/50 after expenses) and register as a business partnership or sole proprietorship to handle taxes, as ManyVids issues 1099 forms in the US. Additionally, the market is saturated
This article is a work in progress and will continue to receive ongoing updates and improvements. It’s essentially a collection of notes being assembled. I hope it’s useful to those interested in getting the most out of pfSense.
pfSense has been pure joy learning and configuring for the for past 2 months. It’s protecting all my Linux stuff, and FreeBSD is a close neighbor to Linux.
I plan on comparing OPNsense next. Stay tuned!
Update: June 13th 2025
Diagnostics > Packet Capture
I kept running into a problem where the NordVPN app on my phone refused to connect whenever I was on VLAN 1, the main Wi-Fi SSID/network. Auto-connect spun forever, and a manual tap on Connect did the same.
Rather than guess which rule was guilty or missing, I turned to Diagnostics > Packet Capture in pfSense.
1 — Set up a focused capture
Set the following:
192.168.1.105(my iPhone’s IP address)2 — Stop after 5-10 seconds
That short window is enough to grab the initial handshake. Hit Stop and view or download the capture.
3 — Spot the blocked flow
Opening the file in Wireshark or in this case just scrolling through the plain-text dump showed repeats like:
UDP 51820 is NordLynx/WireGuard’s default port. Every packet was leaving, none were returning. A clear sign the firewall was dropping them.
4 — Create an allow rule
On VLAN 1 I added one outbound pass rule:
The moment the rule went live, NordVPN connected instantly.
Packet Capture is often treated as a heavy-weight troubleshooting tool, but it’s perfect for quick wins like this: isolate one device, capture a short burst, and let the traffic itself tell you which port or host is being blocked.
Update: June 15th 2025
Keeping Suricata lean on a lightly-used secondary WAN
When you bind Suricata to a WAN that only has one or two forwarded ports, loading the full rule corpus is overkill. All unsolicited traffic is already dropped by pfSense’s default WAN policy (and pfBlockerNG also does a sweep at the IP layer), so Suricata’s job is simply to watch the flows you intentionally allow.
That means you enable only the categories that can realistically match those ports, and nothing else.
Here’s what that looks like on my backup interface (
WAN2):The ticked boxes in the screenshot boil down to two small groups:
app-layer-events,decoder-events,http-events,http2-events, andstream-events. These Suricata needs to parse HTTP/S traffic cleanly.emerging-botcc.portgrouped,emerging-botcc,emerging-current_events,emerging-exploit,emerging-exploit_kit,emerging-info,emerging-ja3,emerging-malware,emerging-misc,emerging-threatview_CS_c2,emerging-web_server, andemerging-web_specific_apps.Everything else—mail, VoIP, SCADA, games, shell-code heuristics, and the heavier protocol families, stays unchecked.
The result is a ruleset that compiles in seconds, uses a fraction of the RAM, and only fires when something interesting reaches the ports I’ve purposefully exposed (but restricted by alias list of IPs).
That’s this keeps the fail-over WAN monitoring useful without drowning in alerts or wasting CPU by overlapping with pfSense default blocks.
Update: June 18th 2025
I added a new pfSense package called Status Traffic Totals:
Update: October 7th 2025
Upgraded to pfSense 2.8.1:
Fantastic article @hydn !
Over the years, the RFC 1918 (private addressing) egress configuration had me confused. I think part of the problem is that my ISP likes to send me a modem one year and a combo modem/router the next year…making this setting interesting.
I see that Netgate has finally published a good explanation and guidance for RFC 1918 egress filtering:
I did not notice that addition, thanks for sharing!